THOUGHTS JULY 22, 2014
At the moment I sit down in despair at my computer,
agonizing over the crisis situations I see on CNN, MSNBC, Aljazeera America and
regular channels. First, there’s the
crash site in Ukraine still open to looting and tampering by pro-Russian thugs
(look, I heard them, and that’s what they are!)
By all accounts (except Putin’s) they (or Russian troops) shot down a
passenger plane with almost 300 innocent people aboard, 200 of them from the Netherlands. And for over a week brutish soldiers have looted
the personal effects and identities of the crash victims and refused to let
experts examine the wreckage, scattered over an enormous area that includes
farms and villages.
Finally these self-proclaimed Russian freedom-fighters allowed
bodies to be crudely stacked in poorly-refrigerated cattle cars and shipped to
the Netherlands, where for the last two days we have watched crowds of an
outraged but dignified people honor their dead as casket after casket in motorcades
entered a military base for proper identification and return to loved
ones. At the same time, fragments of
bodies and important airplane wreckage still have not been collected because
pro-Russian troops have not allowed outside experts into the site for long
enough to do their jobs. They intend to
defend the land they have occupied by force in eastern Ukraine. The fighting is intensifying as I write this. Carol and I are scheduled to spend most of
August in Russia (mostly at the Hermitage Museum), so all of this is making us
nervous. We leave in a little over a
week.
The second major crisis going on right now is between
Palestinians and Israelis. Nothing new,
but the increasing number of casualties in Gaza as a result of Israel’s “target
bombs” is sickening. The 6-year Israeli land-sea-and-air
embargo on Gaza is in effect imprisoning and nearly starving the
population. In response, the Hamas
government built a network of tunnels that allows radical Muslim Gazans to
enter Egypt and Israel to kill Jews. It
is easy to see why citizens would welcome Hamas military help. But Israel is not going to budge on
this. And Hamas-led Palestine seems
ready to fight even if every man, woman and child in Gaza is killed in the
effort. And despite the fact that few of
the hundreds of rockets Hamas fires daily into Israel can penetrate the anti-missile
“dome” over the country. So the unequal
casualty list to date – nearly a thousand Gazans to 35 Israelis – seems
outrageous. Two brief cease-fires have
come and gone, and the shelling on both sides has resumed. Pictures of the dead and wounded spill out of
the TV screen.
From my posh ivory tower in the California desert (Del Webb
Sun City Palm Desert), with almost nobody around me to talk to about anything
(or not) -- other than Obama-care (devil-sent), golf, sports, houses owned and
sold, hedge funds, the stock market, cruises, restaurants and ballroom dances
in the area, and Obama (the Devil himself) -- I try my best to engage people in
issues I am passionate about. Those
include meditation, Japanese language and customs, and then (working back in
time from today) the deadly disputes in Gaza, Israel, Ukraine, Russia, Libya,
Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, and the Americas south of Texas and
America itself. All of those issues
relate to the age-old questions about God and land: what does “He” teach and who owns what? No wonder I was attracted to the pacific (and
godless) teachings of Buddhism from an early age!
For my Facebook friends, here are two news flashes from my
tower regarding (1) a movie and (2) a magazine article. The movie is BOYHOOD by Richard Linklater,
whose WAKING LIFE first knocked the breath out of me when it came out in 2001. Most of his other films have at least made me
utter a prayer of thanks for him. But
after looking at BOYHOOD for about 3 hours, Carol and I looked at each other
and said nothing. What’s to say? This is one fine film. I want to translate it immediately into
Japanese and add it to my arsenal of teaching materials for Japanese students
learning about America.
The movie was made over a 12-year period in the life of an
actual boy, Ellar Coltrane (Mason in the film) from grade school to
college. His mother is played by a
brilliant Patricia Arquette, and his older sister is played by Linklater’s
actual daughter, Lorelei (Samantha in the film.) My only problem with the film is why nobody
in it speaks “Texan”, but I think I know why.
First, there is a scene in which the laid-back liberal father, played flawlessly
by Ethan Hawke, mercilessly (and hilariously) bad-mouths outgoing President
George W. Bush. (He even steals a McCain
sign from a Texas neighbor’s yard while putting up Obama signs with his son and
daughter.) I think that scene would be
very confusing if the father sounded exactly like Bush. Also, I think most Americans (and maybe all
English speakers) would tire of hearing Texan spoken for the length of a
film. Besides, Texans in the flesh can
be heard in another Linklater film, “Bernie” (2011), which should satisfy
anybody wanting to subject themselves to native speech.
The magazine article is by Jonathan Rauch, a contributing
editor to The Atlantic, and author of a fine introductory book on Japan
that I used for years in some of my classes at Pepperdine in Malibu and
International Christian University in Omika, Japan. It is called “The Outnation” (1992). The magazine article appeared in the
July/August 2014 issue of The Atlantic, p. 20-21, and it deals with the
recent troubling matter of certain Christians trying to cut themselves off from
mainstream American society and laws in the name of religious freedom. I like the article so much that I am quoting
large portions of it here without comment.
Its point is very much the point of BOYHOOD, as well, in the sense that
both the film and article are telling us that the youth of today may be on the
right track to everything.
“I am someone who believes that religious liberty is the
country’s founding freedom, the idea that made America possible. I am also a homosexual atheist, so religious
conservatives may not want my advice.
I’ll give it to them anyway.
Culturally conservative Christians are taking a pronounced turn toward
social secession: asserting both the
right and the intent to sequester themselves from secular culture and norms,
including the norm of nondiscrimination.
This is not a good idea. When
religion isolates itself from secular society, both sides lose, but religion
loses more.
… Why the hunkering down?
When I asked around recently, a few answers came back. One is the fear that traditional religious
views, especially about marriage, will soon be condemned as no better than
racism, and that religious dissenters will be driven from respectable society,
denied government contracts, and passed over for jobs …
… I wonder whether religious advocates of these opt-outs
have thought through the implications.
Associating Christianity with a desire – no, a determination to
discriminate puts the faithful in open conflict with the value that young
Americans hold most sacred. They might
as well write off the next two or three or 10 generations, among whom
nondiscrimination is the 11th commandment.
… This much I can guarantee:
the First Church of Discrimination will find few adherents in 21st-century
America. Polls find that, year by year,
Americans are growing more secular. The
trend is particularly pronounced among the young, many of whom have come to
equate religion with intolerance. Social
secession will only exacerbate that trend.”
